Write a critical commentary on R (on the application of Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15
The commentary should have:
-Critically assess techniques of legal reasoning adopted in deciding the case, and how they are used. (50% of marks)
-legal reasonings (feminism, legal liberalism, pluralism, formalism and realism)
-Explain what this judgment can tell us about the political dimensions of judging in England and Wales. (50% of marks)
-Reference supporting case
-Do not need to present the facts of case, the introduction itself should jump straight to techniques of legal reasoning.
-Referencing style has to be OSCOLA.

Critical law essay
Write a critical commentary on R (on the application of Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15
The commentary should have:
-Critically assess techniques of legal reasoning adopted in deciding the case, and how they are used. (50% of marks)
-legal reasonings (feminism, legal liberalism, pluralism, formalism and realism)
-Explain what this judgment can tell us about the political dimensions of judging in England and Wales. (50% of marks)
-Reference supporting case
-Do not need to present the facts of case, the introduction itself should jump straight to techniques of legal reasoning.
-Referencing style has to be OSCOLA.

Critical law essay
Write a critical commentary on R (on the application of Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15
The commentary should have:
-Critically assess techniques of legal reasoning adopted in deciding the case, and how they are used. (50% of marks)
-legal reasonings (feminism, legal liberalism, pluralism, formalism and realism)
-Explain what this judgment can tell us about the political dimensions of judging in England and Wales. (50% of marks)
-Reference supporting case
-Do not need to present the facts of case, the introduction itself should jump straight to techniques of legal reasoning.
-Referencing style has to be OSCOLA.